Sports•International Bureau•13 Nov 2026, 06:29 PM PKT•3 min read•1,448 Reads

Judges close part of ICC Afghanistan investigations that could look at US troops

Prosecutors appeal decision as ICC formally closes probe into alleged US troop crimes and ISIS-K. National News Pakistan correspondents report that administrative desks and on-ground observers are closely monitoring developments across Pakistan.

60-Second Editorial Quick Summaryخلاصہ

Verified facts & intelligence briefed by National News Press Bureau.

Prosecutors appeal decision as ICC formally closes probe into alleged US troop crimes and ISIS-K.

National News Pakistan correspondents report that administrative desks and on-ground observers are closely monitoring developments across Pakistan.

Verified by National News Pakistan Central Editorial Desk under Sports coverage.

NNP Central Editorial Research Desk
#Pakistan National Bureau#Sports Desk
WhatsApp𝕏 PostFacebook
Judges close part of ICC Afghanistan investigations that could look at US troops
Photo: National News Pakistan Bureau

INTERNATIONAL BUREAU —Judges at the International Criminal Court have issued a decision to formally close part of the prosecutor's investigations into Afghanistan that previously ​looked at alleged crimes by US troops and to focus only ‌on actions of the Taliban since 2021, court documents show.

The decision by the chamber formally closes not only the line of inquiry into alleged crimes by US troops, which ​had already lain dormant since 2021, but also a probe into the ​Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K) militia. The office of the prosecutor told ⁠Reuters on Friday it had appealed the decision but could not give further ​details.

It is the latest step in a legal tussle between prosecutors and judges ​about the Afghanistan case, and comes after the United States issued institutional sanctions against the court, citing US opposition to arrest warrants issued for Israeli officials and the investigation into actions ​of US soldiers in Afghanistan.

Read: US activists urge ICC to issue arrest warrants for Trump and Rubio over Gaza This year, judges ordered prosecutors to split their ​Afghanistan inquiries into two separate probes — one focusing on the alleged crimes committed by the ‌Taliban since ⁠2021, and the other on the original Afghanistan inquiry, which also looked at alleged war crimes by US troops but has shifted towards looking at the ISIS-K militia.

Judges said they had decided to close part of ​the case because prosecutors ​had not shown ⁠they would be able to effectively investigate allegations in Afghanistan apart from the Taliban probe. The splitting of the ​cases means the arrest warrants issued against four Afghan Taliban leaders remain ​in effect.

It ⁠is unclear if formally closing part of the Afghanistan case will be enough to allay American fears over the court exerting jurisdiction over US nationals, as it ⁠does ​not change the court's founding statute. The statute ​says the court can prosecute anyone accused of atrocity crimes committed on the territory of ICC member ​states.

Key Takeaways & Executive Analysis

  • Judges at the International Criminal Court have issued a decision to formally close part of the prosecutor's investigations into Afghanistan that previously ​looked at alleged crimes by US troops and to focus only ‌on actions of the Taliban since 2021, court documents show.
  • The decision by the chamber formally closes not only the line of inquiry into alleged crimes by US troops, which ​had already lain dormant since 2021, but also a probe into the ​Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K) militia.
  • The office of the prosecutor told ⁠Reuters on Friday it had appealed the decision but could not give further ​details.
Verified National Coverage: Published by National News Press (International Bureau). Fact-checked and verified.
Verified Editorial Desk
WhatsApp𝕏 PostFacebook

Audience Reviews & Discussion

Share your perspective, rate coverage accuracy, and engage with verified readers across Pakistan.

Rate This Story

Join the Discussion

Civic discussion moderated by NNP Editorial Desk

Community Comments (0)